What Is The Difference Between Cruiser And Touring Motorcycles

I think its mostly semantics but to me the main difference is range.

What is the difference between cruiser and touring motorcycles. The touring bike is traditionally built for comfort reliability and long trips. However they can also be used for urban riding or commuting purposes. A true tourer will get 250 kms on a tank.

The cruiser on the other hand is more about style power and hard riding. It takes a couple weeks to get used to a new position but IMO sport-touring bikes have the most natural sustainable position for. The Harley Davidson Cruiser has a massive build and often is more durable and has more power.

Touring bikes are also on the heavy side but built for very different purposes. A touring bike is simpler and the details are all about functionality as opposed to aesthetics. They put a lot more weight on your lower back and butt than an upright standard or sport touring position.

Of course there are exceptions to all of these. That helps cruiser bikes that have minimal suspension the softer sidewalls add some comfort. Cruisers are always big in the style department.

Of all the categories of different motorcycles available none is more misunderstood than that of the touring bike. This is a big generalization. Standards can be equipped with hard containers but they dont have nearly the same luggage capacity as cruisers do.

But cruiser motorcycles do have standard motorcycles beat on travel accessories. However they vary greatly from the North American touring motorcycle because they were based off the sport motorcycle architecture rather than a cruiser. The difference between these two models is quite easy to understand.